Moving The RNC/MNGOP Forward
My good friend, Lt. Col. Joe Repya has a series of posts up on what the MNGOP can do to move forward after 4 years of leadership punctuated by back to back electoral losses, tepid fundraising and a volunteer base who simply told the party to "buzz off - you don't represent me any more!" While most of it is directed toward the MNGOP (he is after all running for the MNGOP chair again this year) there is much that every state and, most importantly, the national GOP can learn from this 6 part series of posts. There are a lot of good ideas in parts 1-5, but I want to focus on part 6 which is the conclusion of the series.
What happened in Rochester is not limited to the MNGOP - for those that were not there the short story is if you were a Ron Paul delegate or anyone who dared to disagree with the direction of the state party and you made the mistake of vocalizing it, you were shut down cold by those who were running the convention (the state party chair and his allies). I know from talking to others in other states that this was the modus operandi in just about every state convention across the country this year and I know that this is what happened to the Paul campaign at the RNC Convention in St. Paul. However that is all in the past. IF we are ever to move forward into 2010 we need...
We also need candidates who will walk the walk.
Gee this seems to be a theme among the conservative base. I think I may have mentioned this a time or three myself.
Another thing I may have mentioned here a time or three is this...
The only "idea" that today's Republican Party has EVER had has been the "we don't like the Democrats or their ideas" idea. The Contract With America has been the closest that we have ever seen to ideas out of this party. If the party ever wants to move forward we have to have a plan and (most importantly) are NOT AFRAID TO ARTICULATE AND DEFEND IT! Football teams can not win playing the "prevent defense" what makes the RNC think that we can win politically playing the prevent defense? The base is out here doing what we can, but when the party leadership won't even try to defend conservative ideas and ideals - why should the base bother?
What the Republican Party needs today are leaders who are willing to step out of the "way it's always been done" and try new things. We need leaders who are willing to listen to the grass roots and "even" Ron Paul supporters! We have to be willing to learn from others if we are ever going to move this party forward.
In my opinion, we took another beating this year because leadership was too busy dividing this party rather than uniting this party. Therefore, for the sins of few, the many suffered. Anyone who attended the GOP State Convention in Rochester knows of which I speak. We can no longer continue to divide this party by attacking individuals or groups that do not agree 100% with the party leadership. We must be capable of identifying those issues that we all agree with, compromise if possible on those we do not. Only teamwork and a united message will overcome the DFL and left wing liberalism.
What happened in Rochester is not limited to the MNGOP - for those that were not there the short story is if you were a Ron Paul delegate or anyone who dared to disagree with the direction of the state party and you made the mistake of vocalizing it, you were shut down cold by those who were running the convention (the state party chair and his allies). I know from talking to others in other states that this was the modus operandi in just about every state convention across the country this year and I know that this is what happened to the Paul campaign at the RNC Convention in St. Paul. However that is all in the past. IF we are ever to move forward into 2010 we need...
We need leaders with vision and the ability to motivate our grassroots. We need a leader who will sit down and be willing to open the “big tent” that once was this party. We need a party willing to discuss and embrace new ideas, new people, different issues, and opposing attitudes without alienating other individual and groups. We must articulate a message that the conservative wing, the social moderate wing and independents will rally around.
We also need candidates who will walk the walk.
Many Republicans have lost faith in this party because some of our so called “conservative elected office holders” have voted against our core principles for political expediency or to perpetuate their own political ambitions. We need leaders who will never abandon our core principles. We can always compromise on issues, methods, techniques and tactics, but we can never compromise our core principles.
Gee this seems to be a theme among the conservative base. I think I may have mentioned this a time or three myself.
Another thing I may have mentioned here a time or three is this...
In the past, the Republican Party had been the party of ideas. Somewhere we lost our voice and our message. We must be capable of developing new ideas and communicating our message across this state. We must develop a clear and concise message of smaller government, tax reform, corruption reform and spending cuts. We must demonstrate to our fellow Minnesotans how our message and principles will improve their quality of life. In this bad economy, we should start demanding an end to new spending within the State of Minnesota. Here is a novel idea: let’s hold all state department budgets to the 2008 level and shrink the size of our state governmental departments by 5%. There is plenty of government waste that can be eliminated in Saint Paul. Since we have a balanced budget requirement, we should insure that social programs, not public safety programs, are the first to be cut.
The only "idea" that today's Republican Party has EVER had has been the "we don't like the Democrats or their ideas" idea. The Contract With America has been the closest that we have ever seen to ideas out of this party. If the party ever wants to move forward we have to have a plan and (most importantly) are NOT AFRAID TO ARTICULATE AND DEFEND IT! Football teams can not win playing the "prevent defense" what makes the RNC think that we can win politically playing the prevent defense? The base is out here doing what we can, but when the party leadership won't even try to defend conservative ideas and ideals - why should the base bother?
What the Republican Party needs today are leaders who are willing to step out of the "way it's always been done" and try new things. We need leaders who are willing to listen to the grass roots and "even" Ron Paul supporters! We have to be willing to learn from others if we are ever going to move this party forward.
Labels: RNC Chairman
9 Comments:
While you correctly identify the symptoms, I think you are far off in diagnosing the disease and prescribing the cure. The problem is not in our candidates, our Party leadership, or our ideas. We don't need a "new" message or leadership. IMHO what we need is to do all of what we've been doing, only a lot better, and more of it.
-There's nothing wrong with our message, but getting it out in clear, concise terms, and explaining it to the average Joe THROUGH the MSM's liberal filter has proven nearly impossible. How else can you explain that 57% of Obama voters (and no doubt some who voted for McCain) thought Republicans controlled Congress?
-There's nothing wrong with our leaders, either, that I can tell. They all seem to be conservatives, trying to advance the conservative cause, but they get bogged down by fundraising and GOTV and Voter ID and all of the "mechanics" of running campaigns. I'm not sure of how to solve that problem, but replacing the Captain of the Titanic doesn't help a whit, especially after that little ice thingie happens.
-There's nothing wrong with our elected officials. They got elected, and without that there is nothing. If you've got a better Republican, trot them out here and let's see if they can win next time around. If you have more than one that can win, or can be made to win, then we'll pick the most conservative out of the bunch (and good luck with that bit of clairvoyance). Once they're elected, you say they should "never compromise principle," but how do they NOT compromise when almost every bill that comes before them is a conflict between two or more? How can they avoid such conflicts when our platform runs to over 250 planks? It is less self-contradictory than it was, but it still would require some terrible, terrible decisions in the name of "standing on the platform." You're talking about "core principles" as if we all agreed what they are.
Your example of the State convention is a case in point. There were a number of Ron Paul supporters elected as delegates, most with the purpose of electing National delegates to, by most accounts, "make a show" at the RNC for Ron Paul, who couldn't win a single primary. It wasn't a matter of trying to narrow the Party, but a vocal and well-organized minority trying to take the majority somewhere we were not convinced we should go. Was it handled badly? Absolutely, but there is blame for both sides, here.
In short, the key here is that we don't need a lot of criticism of the Party unless we have some workable solutions for what we see as the problems. Suggestions?
By Anonymous, at 6:30 AM
Anon - we need to do WHAT better? More drifting to the left and abandoning our principles? More marginalizing of the conservative base? More "big tent as long as you don't question our judgment" leadership? More "shut up and send money" leadership?
You want suggestions, I suggest that you A) read the links provided to Col. Repya's posts and B)go back and read my posts from the last three days. There are more than a few suggestions there! In addition, you can find a ton of suggestions at Red State, The Next Right and Rebuild the Party just to name a few.
LL
By The Lady Logician, at 8:00 AM
Obviously you were not in Rochester.
The Ron Paul nuts had ample (most people agreed, way too much) time to speak.
Every few minutes one of them would hop up to complain about this or that - only to be soundly voted down by the delegates.
The leader of the Paulians had a chance to make her case to be a delegate and instead spent her time complaining that Ron Paul was not given a chance to speak.
Finally after the main meeting, Joe Repya showed the wisdom of the state central voters by going on an embarrassing tirade at state central - where again, he was soundly voted down by the delegates.
I also find great humor in people looking to Joe as the messenger to bring the party back.
If you will recall, before he decided that being Chair ws his best ticket to glory, he was tentatively announce as the head of MN Veterans for McCain and planned to help him win the nomination.
So if you are looking for a RINO killing leader with new ideas, Joe is not your man.
The opinion of a volunteer -
I don't have to paid to work on elections.
By Anonymous, at 11:08 AM
Ron Paul nuts indeed! Way too much to speak evan after all the rules were broken and the NEOCON/RINO Slate was pre-ordained and shoved down the delegates throats by the current leadership gang? WHO ARE YOU KIDDING? I, as a delegate was surprised that they were as civil as they were. Without someone like REPYA to institute his recommended changes and more the MN GOP will simply continue to be an an ever smaller elite gang of Insane NEOCONS.
By Anonymous, at 2:18 PM
Thanks for the pointers. I haven't had time to research all you cite, but I have gathered a number of others and will be conferring with a group of local Republican leaders in January to put it together. The one thing I am certain of is that just "being more conservative" is NOT the answer.
http://www.freedomdogs.com/news-archive-mainmenu-2/118-conservatism/3356-not-that-simple.html
The folks at Rebuildtheparty have some good ideas, talking about ways to "do it better." I agree. To the degree that the Internet helps, so much the better, but mostly it's just mechanics, not the "new ideas" on how to bypass the media filter or explain simple things to simpler people. Joe Repya has some nuggets, too, along lines I was thinking, but I'm not convinced he has a whole solution. He even says so. The big problem I see is that we, including Col. Joe, need to get past this "circular firing squad" mentality we seem to be stuck in. Doing what must be done is going to be tough enough, so hopefully we'll soon agree what that is.
J. Ewing
By Anonymous, at 6:19 PM
Anon 1...some of those "nuts" were from my district and they played by the rules and got savaged by "good Republicans" like you just because they didn't support the candidate that the leadership favored!
Anon2 - I won't go down the Neo-Con name calling road because there were honest differences of opinions to be had. To call everyone who disagreed with your guys a "neo-con" is just as wrong as Anon1 calling the Paul supporters all "nuts"!
Jerry - running fast to the center is not the answer either. Conservative candidates CAN WIN (see Jason Chaffetz) if they live their principles. The Republican Party has stepped away from their principles and that needs to be addressed. I also agree that we have to get past the "us vs them" mentality as we saw above! We need someone who can bring everyone together and get them toward a common goal!
LL
By The Lady Logician, at 8:14 PM
I agree - finding common ground and teaming up will help us succeed. I'm anonymous here so I can share one local strategy underway:
Local Paul supporters held a home meeting and invited a variety of Republicans and conservatives (myself included). We will begin to work on getting elected from the bottom up: commissions, boards, etc. This is a long-term strategy: to get conservatives into the decision-making local levels, and develop name recognition as candidates move up to higher elected offices.
While we'll never agree with each other on all principles, there was plenty of common ground to motivate the group. Sadly, our BPOU has not developed this strategy in the past, but is teaming up for the future.
By Anonymous, at 8:43 AM
Strange that you credit the Paul people for doing this. Here, it is our local Republican "leadership," and we've been working on it for two years already. I think it is also worthy of note that this has been the official policy of the MNGOP for well over a year!
That's why I get so frustrated with people wanting to blame "leadership" for our troubles, as in the statement "they didn't support the candidate that the leadership favored!" I'll remind you that Chairman Carey supported Huckabee, not McCain. The point is that leadership can actually be "conservative" enough, and even have all of the right strategies-- like local elections-- in place, but unless Republicans come together to make these good ideas, and more, actually happen, they won't happen. First step is to stop the circular firing squad.
J. Ewing
By Anonymous, at 10:36 AM
Does it matter WHO gets the credit guys?
Out here we have Ron Pauls AND the conservatives are working TOGETHER to make changes. We are working together for the greater good!
LL
By The Lady Logician, at 9:20 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home