Ladies Logic

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Letter From A Democrat

I got this email from a friend who now calls himself a "former Democrat". Could this be the feeling of other former Obama supporters? Names changed to protect the emailers privacy.

“Well, uh, you know, I think that whether you’re looking at it from a theological perspective or, uh, a scientific perspective, uh, answering that question with specificity, uh, you know, is, is, uh, above my pay grade.” - Sen. Barack Obama, on “When does a baby get human rights?”

In 1948, they had Harry Truman and “The buck stops here!”

In 2008, they’ve got Barack Obama and it’s “above my pay grade.”

This is definitely not your grandfather’s Democratic Party.

Certainly not mine. My grandfather, Roy F, was a lifelong FDR Democrat, the kind who would proudly rather vote for a wife-beating, syphilitic drunkard than for a Republican. In fact, he would find the previous sentence entirely redundant.

My grandfather helped push Patton’s tanks across Europe, and one reason for my grandfather’s unshakable party loyalty was his belief that Harry Truman saved his life by dropping the A-bombs on Japan.

If Truman hadn’t made the call - if he’d demurred that such a profound life-and-death decision was “above my pay grade” - my grandfather believed that he and untold thousands of Americans would have died invading the Japanese mainland.

I miss my grandfather, but I’m also glad that he isn’t around to witness the tragic descent of his beloved Democratic Party.

Watching Obama with the Rev. Rick Warren this past weekend, answering questions - or, more accurately, not answering - about his most basic beliefs was simply embarrassing.

Obama supports partial-birth abortion and voted against the “Born Alive Infant Protection Act.” When he got the invitation to an evangelical forum hosted by a pro-life pastor, he had to know that issues regarding life and the law were going to come up.

And his prepared answer to the most fundamental question about public policy and abortion (“is the fetus a human being?”) is that it’s “above my pay grade?”

There are certain sentences that should never appear on the lips of the Leader of the Free World. “That Vladimir Putin, what a great guy!” is one of them. “I did not have sex with that woman” is another.

But on the very top of the list of statements about our nation’s laws that should never be spoken by a guy whose job it is to sit next to the Big, Red Button is “That’s above my pay grade.”

With all due respect, Sen. Obama, being president is above your pay grade. And the voters are starting to figure that out.

Politico.com reported yesterday that 75 percent of Americans believe that John McCain can “handle the job of commander in chief.” Only 50 percent feel the same about Obama. A whopping 42 percent told pollsters they believe Obama is simply not up to the task.

Who can blame them? Obama wants the difficult duty of taking on Iran and North Korea, but he can’t even handle Rick Warren or the Clintons - the latter having commandeered Obama’s own convention in Denver next week and forced their way into a pro-Hillary roll call. Having been routed by the Clintonistas, Obama wants a chance to lead against al-Qaeda? Please.

Leaders don’t pass tough questions to the next “pay grade.” They don’t need five minutes to answer yes-or-no questions about the surge or Russia’s invasion of a democratic neighbor.

Politicians flip-flop on taxes and FISA and the Second Amendment to meet the political needs of the moment. They try to explain away the votes they’ve already cast, like Obama’s extreme pro-abortion voting record. Or they courageously cast 130 non-votes of “present” in the Illinois legislature and pass the buck that way.

That’s not leadership, that’s politics. And Barack Obama is 100 percent pure politician.

He is certainly no Harry Truman

Labels:

10 Comments:

  • Your post runs far afield of the original question, but do you mind if we come back to that point?

    When does human life begin? Can you answer that question? Can anyone? Religious folks answer it out of their belief system and expect the rest of us to accept it as well. But there is no scientific evidence for the rest of us apart from the able-to-survive-outside-the-womb argument.

    So McCain stated what he believed: life begins at conception. He has no proof of it, he just believes it through his faith.

    Obama honestly stated he doesn't know and in fact no-one knows. The "above my pay grade" comment might have been somewhat glib, but it illustrates exactly that someone more knowledgeable than anyone on earth at this time might know, but the rest of us do not.

    I remain a Democrat for Obama.

    By Blogger Bekkieann, at 3:15 PM  

  • OMG! A candidate campaigning like he's running for office or something! This is terrible!

    Count the lobbyists, then get back to me on this propped up "true politician" assertion you've made.

    By Blogger Jason The, at 4:59 PM  

  • Bekki - the only writing that is mine is in italics...the rest is from the email that I got. The thoughts that you are questioning belong to someone else. I can attempt to answer, but since I don't know for sure what the author would say....

    Jason - you and I know that. My problem all along has been with the folks who claimed that Senator Obama was "different" from those other politicians who say one thing and do another when running for office.

    As far as counting the lobbyists....I don't think you want to know the answer. Because your guy has the bigger number - when push comes to shove.

    LL

    By Blogger The Lady Logician, at 5:08 PM  

  • In his opposition to the Illinois Born Alive Act, Obama went past the "I don't know when life begins" position into "I support infanticide".

    http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=V...feature=related

    Remember, Obama doesn't want one of His daughters "punished" with a baby.

    By Blogger Kermit, at 9:21 AM  

  • Come on, Kermit. Being pro-choice in no way makes one a supporter of infanticide. I know a lot of pro-McCain people are trying to stretch the IF/THEN argument on this one. But the position is so extreme and far from what Obama repeatedly says himself, that most people see your supposition for what it is.

    (P.S. I would watch the YouTube link if it worked, but it doesn't).

    By Blogger Bekkieann, at 3:01 PM  

  • Yeah, I can't fix it.
    Obama is guilty of opposing the Born Alive Act. There is no arguing the fact. If a mom comes to the hospital to kill her baby, then Obama is going to make sure that baby dies.

    By Blogger Kermit, at 3:32 PM  

  • Here's what Obama said on August 16th about his opposition to the act:

    "I have said repeatedly that I would have been completely in, fully in support of the federal bill that everybody supported - which was to say --that you should provide assistance to any infant that was born - even if it was as a consequence of an induced abortion. That was not the bill that was presented at the state level. What that bill also was doing was trying to undermine Roe vs. Wade. By the way, we also had a bill, a law already in place in Illinois that insured life saving treatment was given to infants.

    So for people to suggest that I and the Illinois medical society, and Illinois doctors were somehow in favor of withholding life saving support from an infant born alive is ridiculous. It defies common sense and it defies imagination, and for people to keep on pushing this offensive it's an example of the kind of politics that we have to get beyond. It's one thing for people to disagree with me about the issue of choice, it's another thing for people to out and out misrepresent my positions repeatedly, even after they know that they're wrong. And that's what's been happening.

    By Blogger Bekkieann, at 4:38 PM  

  • Becky, He was lying. The state bill was identical to the federal one he voted for.
    Roe V Wade = liberal religion.

    By Blogger Kermit, at 6:08 PM  

  • Ok Kermit. If you could write the law, what would it be?

    By Blogger Bekkieann, at 12:13 AM  

  • Bekki - Kermit is correct. I linked in a previous post to the legislation in question.

    http://www.ladieslogic.com/2008/08/defining-life.html

    Senator Obama lied at the Saddleback Forum. The bill that he says he supported he killed in committee. I have two links in the post above that talks about the legislation in question - legislation that HAD the neutrality language that would have protected a womans right to abort her baby AND to protect the baby should it manage to survive the abortion.

    LL

    By Blogger The Lady Logician, at 9:05 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home