Ladies Logic

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Cost Of The Compromise

Great news out of DC tonight. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has taken a look at today's compromise bill and it looks like the taxpayers are going to get a (small) break.

I
n any case, the ultimate cost to the government on the transactions would not be the total amount spent to purchase assets—limited to $700 billion outstanding at any one time—but rather the difference between the amount spent by the government and the amount received in earnings and sales proceeds when all of the assets are finally sold, presumably some years from now. That net cost is likely to be substantially less than $700 billion but is more likely than not to be greater than zero.


While I am still not happy that we the people are going to be on the hook for bailing out a bunch of failed CEO's, I am very glad to see that pork provisions to assist ACORN and people who can't make their car and credit card payments were taken out.

Labels:

6 Comments:

  • Oh yeah, that money going to ACORN was truly our greatest concern. No really. Thank God that was taken out... we can all sleep easy now.

    You listen to too much Rush.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 2:00 AM  

  • CEO bonuses = minor inconvenience. Helping the victims of predatory lenders = pork of the worst kind.

    Hey anon! She listens to no one but Rush and his dittohead pals. Then she regurgitates it all here.

    It's perfectly logical, see?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:56 AM  

  • I agree. The Lady is at her core someone who is an authoritarian follower of the worst kind. She blindly says what she's told to say and by golly, if the idea of Congress listening to the concerns of ordinary people is on today's hit list, she'll perform as if she were the Chatty Cathy doll and Rush were pulling the string.

    Just think of her as the one in the Milgram experiments who never once blinked as the 450 volt limits were reached.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:44 AM  

  • Do you enjoy talking to yourself anony?

    1) I don't listen to Rush. I have much more important things to do with my time.

    2) Those who were hit by "predatory" lenders (have you ever heard of a little bill called the Truth in Lending bill?) were supposedly helped in the LAST bail out bill. If they were not helped then, what makes you think Congress is going to do it now?

    3) Why are the Democrats so afraid to put any kind of oversight into this bill? Why were they blind to the FACT that Fannie and Freddie were going under - information that they had two years ago?

    4) Why are YOU afraid to pick an ID so that a person can have a reasonable discussion with you - as opposed to throwing out random snark with no discussion of the issues at hand?

    LL

    By Blogger The Lady Logician, at 6:17 PM  

  • BTW anon....IF you had listened to Jazz and I talk about this on the BTR show you would know that the CEO's who caused this crisis are in my cross hairs too!

    But then again why let a little thing like FACT get in the way of a good assumption.....

    LL

    By Blogger The Lady Logician, at 6:39 PM  

  • Quite a leap of logic there LL.

    Democrats led on what oversight there was in this bill. And if we're going to point the oversight finger, where were your Republicans the past several years? Oh yeah...

    And I'm going to lose my liberal card for this one, but weren't the CEO's just taking advantage of the relaxed regulations? Oh yeah... again.

    Not a fan of anonymous commenting myself, but I'm even less of a fan of someone ignoring large facts nitpicking others for missing trivial ones. Pot, kettle, etc.

    By Blogger Jason The, at 9:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home